Skip to main content

Table 1 Illustrative points system for the incremental-benefits variable

From: Which health technologies should be funded? A prioritization framework based explicitly on value for money

Dimensions

Points (weights)

Lives saved, including ‘statistical’ lives (i.e. cure or reduced risk of death)

 

 None (or not yet known)

0

 Few: 1-50 lives saved

0.091

 Some: 51-250 lives saved

0.192

 Many: 251-500 lives saved

0.268

 Very many: > 500 lives saved

0.343

Life-prolongation benefits – in terms of increase in life expectancy and its quality-of-life, and number of patients affected

 

 None/Very small (or not yet known)

0

 Small benefits

0.053

 Medium benefits

0.152

 Large benefits

0.244

Quality-of-life gains – in terms of baseline QoL, size of QoL gains and duration, and number of patients affected

 

 None/Very small (or not yet known)

0

 Small QoL gains

0.051

 Medium QoL gains

0.138

 Large QoL gains

0.217

If this technology were not to be funded …

 

 Many/most patients will be able to pay for it themselves (privately)

0

 Many/most patients will get an alternative treatment (less effective) already funded by government

0.055

 Many/most patients will not receive any treatment for condition

0.108

Other important social or ethical benefits, e.g. targeted to children/minorities; reduces health gaps, etc

 

 None/Very small (or not yet known)

0

 Yes

0.087

  1. Note: The bolded values represent the relative weights of the dimensions overall (i.e. the bolded values sum to unity).