Skip to main content

Table 1 Sample characteristics and language concordance, n(%)*

From: Transitions from hospital to community care: the role of patient–provider language concordance

 

Total

Hebrew

Russian

Arabic

P value**

92 (100%)

31 (33.7%)

31 (33.7%)

30 (32.6%)

Age (Mean, SD)

59.3 (15.9)

59 (14.8)

67.2 (10.9)

51.4 (17.8)

<0.05†, <0.001†

Gender (female)

43 (46.7)

12 (38.7)

20 (64.5)

11 (36.7)

<0.05‡

Education (High-School or less)

50 (54.3)

21. (67.7)

3 (9.7)

26 (86.7)

<0.001‡

Economic status

     

Poor and Very Poor

33 (35.9)

11 (35.5)

8 (25.8)

14 (46.7)

>0.05

Like others

42 (45.7)

13 (41.9)

18 (58.1)

11 (36.7)

 

Good and very good

17 (18.5)

7 (22.6)

5 (16.1)

5 (16.7)

 

Health status (mean, SD)

     

  PCS

32.8 (10.8)

31.9 (11.3)

31.4 (11.1)

35.2 (10.2)

>0.05

  MCS

34.4 (12.5)

33.4 (11.8)

38.2 (14.8)

31.3 (09.1)

<0.05¶

Language concordance (yes)

61 (66.3)

31 (100)

17 (54.8)

13 (43.3)

<0.001‡

  1. SD: standard deviation; PCS: physical component score; MCS: mental component score (SF-12 v.2).
  2. *% Varies due to missing responses.
  3. **p-values derived from t-test for continuous variables and chi-square tests for categorical variables.
  4. †Significant difference between Hebrew and Russian speakers (p < 0.05) and between Russian and Arabic Speakers (p < 0.001).
  5. ‡Significant difference among all three groups.
  6. ¶Significant difference between Russian and Arabic speakers.