Skip to main content

Table 2 The Committee’s and the sample ranking of technologies evaluated by the 2006/7 Basket Committee (monthly cost threshold = 125 NIS)

From: Do the equity-efficiency preferences of the Israeli Basket Committee match those of Israeli health policy makers?

Technology

Committee’s inclusion decision

Rank Basket Committee

Rank survey - Total

Rank survey - Physicians

Rank survey - Members of any Basket Committee

Rank efficiencya

Crestor Ezetrol

YES

1

18

18

15

12

Atacand Ocsaar Diovan Olmetec

YES

2

29

29

25

3

Lantus Levemir

YES

3

29

29

25

5

Apidra Humalog Novorapid

YES

4

29

29

25

9

Eloxatin

YES

5

15

15

15

4

Xeloda

YES

6

15

15

15

1

Herceptin

YES

7

11

11

12

23

Hepsera

YES

8

3

3

3

16

Viread

YES

9

9

8

7

22

Prevnar

YES

10

33

33

33

32

Mabthera

YES

11

1

1

1

14

Keppra

YES

12

21

21

24

28

Zyprexa

YES

13

22

22

22

6

Exjade

YES

14

5

4

4

19

Plavix (cardiac)

YES

15

8

8

5

10

Growth hormon

YES

16

14

14

11

13

Plavix (stroke)

YES

17

1

1

1

8

Velcade

YES

18

4

5

5

27

Zomera

NO

26.5

11

11

12

29

Apo-Go

NO

26.5

6

6

9

21

Azilect

NO

26.5

6

6

9

17

Cetuximab (Erbitux®)

NO

26.5

25

24

25

31

Doxil

NO

26.5

15

15

15

11

Emend

NO

26.5

25

24

25

33

Erlotinib (Tarceva®)

NO

26.5

25

24

25

30

Faslodex

NO

26.5

11

11

12

24

Forteo

NO

26.5

28

28

25

34

Gardasil

NO

26.5

9

8

7

20

Lucentis

NO

26.5

18

18

15

18

Rimonabant (Acomplia®)

NO

26.5

34

34

34

25

Sifrol

NO

26.5

20

20

21

26

Spiriva

NO

26.5

29

29

25

7

Zemplar

NO

26.5

22

22

22

15

Zyban

NO

26.5

24

27

20

2

Mean rank

YES

9.5

14.8

16.9

16.1

14.0

NO

26.5

19.3

19.2

18.8

21.4

  1. aBy international data on cost per QALY gained