Skip to main content

Table 3 The Committee’s and the sample ranking of technologies evaluated by the 2006/7 Basket Committee (monthly cost threshold = 250 NIS)

From: Do the equity-efficiency preferences of the Israeli Basket Committee match those of Israeli health policy makers?

Technology

Committee’s inclusion decision

Rank Basket Committee

Rank survey - Total

Rank survey - Physicians

Rank survey - Members of any Basket Committee

Rank efficiencya

Crestor Ezetrol

YES

1

28

28

25

12

Atacand Ocsaar Diovan Olmetec

YES

2

28

28

25

3

Lantus Levemir

YES

3

17

17

14

5

Apidra Humalog Novorapid

YES

4

28

28

25

9

Eloxatin

YES

5

14

14

14

4

Xeloda

YES

6

14

14

14

1

Herceptin

YES

7

10

10

11

23

Hepsera

YES

8

2

2

2

16

Viread

YES

9

9

7

7

22

Prevnar

YES

10

32

32

32

32

Mabthera

YES

11

1

1

1

14

Keppra

YES

12

20

20

24

28

Zyprexa

YES

13

21

21

22

6

Exjade

YES

14

4

4

3

19

Plavix (cardiac)

YES

15

7

7

4

10

Growth hormon

YES

16

13

13

10

13

Plavix (stroke)

YES

17

7

7

4

8

Velcade

YES

18

3

3

4

27

Zomera

NO

26.5

10

10

11

29

Apo-Go

NO

26.5

5

5

8

21

Azilect

NO

26.5

5

5

8

17

Cetuximab (Erbitux®)

NO

26.5

25

25

25

31

Doxil

NO

26.5

14

14

14

11

Emend

NO

26.5

33

33

33

33

Erlotinib (Tarceva®)

NO

26.5

25

25

25

30

Faslodex

NO

26.5

10

10

11

24

Forteo

NO

26.5

27

27

25

34

Gardasil

NO

26.5

23

23

19

20

Lucentis

NO

26.5

17

17

14

18

Rimonabant (Acomplia®)

NO

26.5

34

34

34

25

Sifrol

NO

26.5

19

19

21

26

Spiriva

NO

26.5

28

28

25

7

Zemplar

NO

26.5

21

21

22

15

Zyban

NO

26.5

23

23

19

2

Mean rank

YES

9.5

14.3

14.2

13.4

14.0

NO

26.5

19.9

19.9

19.6

21.4

  1. aBy international data on cost per QALY gained