Skip to main content

Table 3 Analysis of Variance Quality of Life (QUALIDEM)

From: More staff = better quality of life for people with dementia? results of a secondary data analysis in German shared-housing arrangements

Dependent Variable

p-Value Model

R2

Independent (Co-)Variable

p-Value Variable

Estimate

95% CI

QUALIDEM: total Score

<  0.001

0.216

Intercept

<  0.001

37.99

24.65:51.34

Sex: femalea

0.253

1.84

− 1.32;5.01

At least 1 challenging behaviour (CMAI) b

<  0.001

−10.40

− 13.22;- 7.58

Cognitive decline (GDS) c

   

≤ 5

0.008

6.75

1.77;11.73

6

0.195

2.29

−1.18;5.76

Level of care dependencyd

   

0

0.111

6.06

−1.40;13.52

I

0.054

5.17

−0.09;10.43

II

0.737

−0.68

−4.63;3.28

Age*

0.001

0.27

0.12;0.42

Length of ataye,*

0.230

0.39

−0.245;1.02

Ratio total-staff per resident*

0.804

0.25

−1.75;2.25

QUALIDEM: care relationship

<  0.001

0.163

Intercept

<  0.001

46.96

26.08;67.85

Sex: female a

0.043

5.11

0.154;10.07

At least 1 challenging behaviour (CMAI) b

<  0.001

−14.51

− 18.93;-10.10

Cognitive decline (GDS)c

   

≤ 5

0.188

5.23

−2.57;13.02

6

0.140

4.08

−1.35;9.51

Level of care dependencyd

   

0

0.296

−6.21

−17.88;5.47

I

0.239

−4.93

−13.17;3.30

II

0.017

−7.57

−13.76;-1.39

Age*

0.032

0.26

0.02;0.50

Length of staye,*

0.281

−0.54

−1.53;0.47

Ratio total-staff per resident *

0.442

−1.23

−4.36;1.91

QUALIDEM: positive affect

0.133

0.045

Intercept

0.001

40.61

16.08;65.13

Sex: femalea

0.140

4.38

− 1.44;10.20

at least 1 challenging behaviour (CMAI)b

0.123

−4.08

−9.26;1.11

Cognitive decline (GDS)c

   

≤ 5

0.147

6.76

−2.40;18.39

6

0.070

5.89

−0.49;12.27

Level of care dependencyd

   

0

0.502

4.68

−9.03;18.39

I

0.688

1.98

−7.69;11.65

II

0.630

−1.78

−9.04;5.48

Age*

0.053

0.27

−0.01;0.55

Length of staye,*

0.680

0.24

−0.92;1.40

Ratio total-staff per resident *

0.305

1.92

−1.76;5.59

QUALIDEM: negative affect

<  0.001

0.149

Intercept

<  0.001

57.00

33.32;80.69

Sex: female a

0.006

−7.95

−13.57;-2.33

At least 1 challenging behaviour (CMAI) b

<  0.001

−12.25

−17.26;-7.24

Cognitive decline (GDS)c

   

≤ 5

0.211

5.63

−3.21;14.47

6

0.169

−4.31

−10.47;1.85

Level of care dependencyd

   

0

0.222

8.23

−5.01;21.47

I

0.077

8.43

−0.91;17.76

II

0.403

2.99

−4.03;10.00

Age*

0.360

0.125

−0.14;0.39

Length of staye,*

0.112

0.91

−0.21;2.03

Ratio total-staff per resident *

0.937

−0.143

−3.69;3.41

QUALIDEM: restless tense behavior

<  0.001

0.186

Intercept

0.899

1.85

−26.86;30.56

Sex: femalea

0.592

−1.86

−8.67;4.96

At least 1 challenging behaviour (CMAI) b

<  0.001

−13.99

− 20.06;-7.92

Cognitive decline (GDS) c

   

≤ 5

0.009

14.24

3.53;24.96

6

0.001

13.30

5.84;20.77

Level of care dependencyd

   

0

0.111

13.03

−3.02;29.08

I

0.013

14.39

− 3.07;25.71

II

0.094

7.26

−1.25;15.76

Age*

0.001

0.54

0.21;0.86

Length of staye,*

0.259

0.78

−0.58;2.14

Ratio total-staff per resident *

0.182

−2.93

−7.23;1.37

QUALIDEM: positive self-image

0.001

0.145

Intercept

0.014

47.02

9.63;84.41

Sex: femalea

0.106

−5.56

−13.19;-1.28

At least 1 challenging behaviour (CMAI) b

0.005

−9.42

−2.82;-16.02;

Cognitive decline (GDS) c

   

≤ 5

0.030

8.79

0.86;16.72

Level of care dependencyd

   

0

0.349

9.62

−10.61;29.86

I

0.845

−1.75

− 19.30;15.81

II

0.549

−5.00

−21.41;11.42

Age*

0.057

0.36

−0.01;0.73

Length of staye,*

0.454

−0.60

−2.17;0.98

Ratio total-staff per resident *

0.391

2.21

−2.85;7.27

QUALIDEM: social relationship

<  0.001

0.176

Intercept

<  0.001

42.58

20.75;64.40

Sex: femalea

0.298

2.74

−2.44;7.92

At least 1 challenging behaviour (CMAI) b

<  0.001

−16.38

−21.00;11.77

Cognitive decline (GDS)c

   

≤ 5

0.084

7.17

−0.98;15.31

6

0.182

−3.86

−1.82;19.53

Level of cared

   

0

0.219

7.63

−4.57;19.84

I

0.297

4.57

−4.04;13.17

II

0.565

−1.89

−8.36;4.57

Age*

0.158

0.178

− 0.07;0.43

Length of staye,*

0.456

0.39

−0.64;1.42

Ratio total-staff per resident *

0.688

−0.668

−3.94;2.60

QUALIDEM: social isolation

0.148

0.176

Intercept

<  0.001

42.58

20.75;64.40

Sex: femalea

0.298

2.74

−2.44;7.92

at least 1 challenging behaviour (CMAI) b

<  0.001

−16.38

−11.77;-0.80

Cognitive decline (GDS) c

   

≤ 5

0.084

7.165

−0.98;15.31

6

0.182

3.86

−1.82;9.53

Level of care dependencyd

   

0

0.219

7.63

−4.57;19.84

I

0.297

4.57

−4.04;13.17

II

0.565

−1.89

−8.36;4.57

Age*

0.158

0.178

−0.07;0.43

Length of staye,*

0.456

0.39

−0.64;1.42

Ratio total-staff per resident *

0.688

−0.668

−3.94;2.60

QUALIDEM: feeling at home

0.148

0.070

Intercept

<  0.001

69.33

38.27;100.39

Sex: femalea

0.662

−1.33

−7.34;4.68

at least 1 challenging behaviour (CMAI) b

0.025

−6.28

−11.77;0.80

Cognitive decline (GDS) f

   

≤ 5

0.276

−3.65

−10.23;2.94

Level of care dependencyd

   

0

0.970

0.32

−16.49;17.13

I

0.478

−5.26

−19.84;9.33

II

0.802

−1.73

− 15.37;11.90

Age*

0.407

0.129

−0.18;0.44

Length of staye,*

0.176

0.90

−0.41;2.21

Ratio total-staff per resident *

1.00

−0.01

−4.20;4.20

QUALIDEM: having something to do

<  0.001

0.157

Intercept

0.041

43.81

1.87;85.76

Sex: femalea

0.483

2.89

−5.23;11.00

at least 1 challenging behaviour (CMAI)b

0.088

−6.44

−13.84;0.97

Cognitive decline (GDS) f

   

≤ 5

0.004

13.01

4.11;21.90

Level of caredependencyd

   

0

0.512

7.56

−15.14;30.26

I

0.328

9.80

−9.90;29.49

II

0.709

−3.49

−21.90;14.93

Age*

0.987

0.210

−0.42;0.41

Length of staye,*

0.439

−0.69

−2.46;1.07

Ratio total-staff per Resident *

0.152

4.14

−1.54;9.82

  1. acompared to male; bcompared to no challenging behaviour; ccompared to GDS 7; dcompared to care dependency level III ein the shared-housing arrangement; fcompared to GDS 6; CMAI Cohen-Mansfield-Agitation Inventory, GDS Global Deterioration Scale, RN Registered nurse, CNA Certified nursing assistant; *Co-Variables