Skip to main content

Table 2 Results of Chi-square test and descriptive statistics for health literacy by level of education, language and English comprehension

From: Health literacy in an Israeli elderly population

Items

Level of Education

Health Literacy

χ2(df)

 

Adequate

Marginal

Inadequate

 

Degree of assistance required to read and understand medical material

Item 1. Assistance to read hospital release letter/ summary of doctor’s appointment

Low

0 (0%)

2 (40%)

3 (60%)

6.91 (2)*

High

33 (60%)

7 (12.7%)

15 (27.3%)

Item 2. Assistance to understand doctor’s words

Low

1 (20%)

1 (20%)

3 (60%)

6.8 (2)*

High

37 (67.3%)

10 (18.2%)

8 (14.5%)

Item 5. Assistance to complete medical forms

Low

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

5 (100%)

10.13 (2)**

High

35 (63.6)

4 (7.3)

16 (29.1)

Item 6. Feels confident completing medical forms

Low

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

5 (100%)

7.64 (2)*

High

30 (54.5)

5 (9.1)

20 (36.4)

Item 9. Assistance in understanding test results

Low

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

5 (100%)

8.18 (2)*

High

25 (45.5)

11 (20%)

19 (34.5%)

Degree of difficulty reading medical information written in Hebrew or English about state of health

Item 4. Difficulty to read medical information in Hebrew

Low

1 (20%)

4 (80%)

0 (0%)

15.9***

High

35 (63.6%)

6 (10.9%)

14 (25.5%)

Degree to which subjects understand medical information about their state of health

Item 7. Understands everything the doctor says during an appointment

Low

1 (20%)

3 (60%)

1 (20%)

12.71 (2)**

High

39 (70.9%)

4 (7.3%)

12 (21.8%)

Item 13. Understands the medical terms related to state of health

Low

1 (20%)

0 (0%)

4 (80%)

6.7 (2)*

High

24 (43.6%)

17 (30.9%)

14 (25.5%)

Ability to seek/obtain/ compare information

Language

    

Item 10. Knows how to obtain all the information needed to understand state of health

Hebrew

9 (45%)

7 (25%)

4 (30%)

9.7 (4)*

OtheRussian Russian

4 (28.6%)

2 (14.3%)

8 (57.1%)

Russian

15 (57.7%)

2 (7.7%)

9 (34.6%)

 

Understands English

    

Item 11. Knows how to seek information about state of health on the internet

Good a

12 (60%)

3 (15%)

5 (25%)

9.8 (2)**

Poor

11 (27.5%)

2 (5%)

27 (67.5%)

  1. aGood and Very Good were unified
  2. *p ≤ .05, **p ≤ .01, ***p ≤ .001