Table 3 A comparison of each question separately among the four sectors using the One Way ANOVA test
Question | A Paramedical N = 87 | B Administrative N = 92 | C Nursing N = 186 | D Physicians N = 95 | F | DF | p < 0.05 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mean | SD | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | ||||
Attitude | 3.22 | 0.75 | 3.63 | 0.65 | 3.68 | 0.62 | 3.19 | 0.64 | 17.95 | 3456 | |
1. To what extent were you were involved in the preparations for the accreditation | 3.09 | 0.81 | 3.59 | 0.71 | 3.24 | 0.68 | 3.02 | 0.73 | 13.14 | 408 | A < B, B > D A < C, C > D A = D, B = C |
2. To what extent has the accreditation process improved the quality of care of patients | 3.17 | 0.92 | 3.61 | 0.83 | 3.56 | 0.72 | 3.14 | 0.65 | 15.81 | B > A, C > A B > D, C > D A = D, B = C | |
3. To what extent does the accreditation process has improved the safety of treatment | 3.38 | 0.68 | 3.77 | 0.64 | 3.91 | 0.63 | 3.0 | 0.81 | 16.93 | B > A, C > A A > D, B > D C > D, B = C | |
4. To what extent has the accreditation process improved the safety of the employees | 3.43 | 0.83 | 3.42 | 0.68 | 3.57 | 0.81 | 3.0 | 0.57 | 8.21 | A > D, B > D C > D A = B = C | |
5. To what extent the accreditation process has improved the facilities in your department | 3.11 | 0.84 | 3.53 | 0.72 | 3.71 | 0.69 | 3.18 | 0.59 | 12.13 | A < B, A < C A = D, B = C B > D, C > D | |
6. To what extent, time and resources invested in the hospital were provided sufficiently | 3.08 | 0.71 | 3.68 | 0.81 | 3.81 | 0.66 | 3.25 | 0.68 | 10.23 | A < B, A < C A = D, B = C C > D | |
7. To what extent, time and resources for the Accreditation process invested in the hospital were overstated | 3.31 | 0.81 | 3.49 | 0.69 | 4.22 | 0.61 | 3.03 | 0.67 | 11.23 | A = B, A < C A > D, B < C B > D, C > D | |
8. To what extent written procedures and policies will help you in your work in the future | 3.19 | 0.79 | 3.75 | 0.92 | 3.53 | 0.66 | 3.55 | 0.68 | 6.32 | A < B, A < C A < D B = C = D | |
9. To what extent the accreditation tracers (surveys) contributed to your work and to the quality of care in hospital | 3.28 | 0.8 | 3.66 | 0.58 | 3.93 | 0.68 | 3.21 | 0.78 | 12.33 | A < B, A < C A = D, B < C B > D, C > D | |
10. To what extent would you like to take an active part in promoting the accreditation process in your department | 3.29 | 0.72 | 3.66 | 0.66 | 3.67 | 0.63 | 3.44 | 0.66 | 7.45 | A < B, A < C A = D, B = C B = D, C = D | |
11. To what extent ISBAR or SOAP Can improve the communication between hospital staff | 3.09 | 0.82 | 3.59 | 0.69 | 3.52 | 0.59 | 3.04 | 0.69 | 13.26 | A < B, A < C A = D, B = C B > C, C > D | |
12. To what extent ISBAR or SOAP Can improve the safety of treatment. | 3.18 | 0.78 | 3.64 | 0.64 | 3.75 | 0.68 | 3.5 | 0.72 | 5.34 | A < B, A < B A < D, B = C B = D, C = D | |
13. Do you think the accreditation process has influenced the organization culture in the hospital? | 3.27 | 0.79 | 3.81 | 0.74 | 3.72 | 0.64 | 2.98 | 0.75 | 12.66 | A < B, A < C A > D, B = C B > D, C > D | |
Norms | 3.21 | 0.59 | 3.49 | 0.50 | 3.51 | 0.433 | 3.27 | 0.45 | 10.69 | 3449 | |
14. To what extent your colleagues think that accreditation is useful to hospital in improving the safety of care | 3.29 | 0.63 | 3.51 | 0.55 | 3.65 | 0.45 | 3.27 | 0.49 | 5.65 | A < B, A < C A = D, B = C B > D, C > D | |
15. To what extent your superiors think accreditation is useful to the hospital in improving the safety of care | 3.12 | 0.56 | 3.55 | 0.57 | 3.63 | 0.58 | 3.38 | 0.48 | 7.23 | A < B, A, C A < D, B = C B = D, C > D | |
16. To what extent your superiors expect you to be active in the accreditation process | 3.24 | 0.65 | 3.43 | 0.61 | 3.32 | 0.41 | 3.35 | 0.45 | 0.78 | A = B = C = D | |
17. To what extent do you think a department that manages the process of accreditation is appraised by hospital management | 3.08 | 0.67 | 3.58 | 0.48 | 3.54 | 0.52 | 3.5 | 0.48 | 4.76 | A < B, A < C A < D B = C = D | |
18. To what extent your colleagues think that the accreditation process is necessary in light of overburdening the staff | 3.19 | 0.57 | 3.41 | 0.61 | 3.51 | 0.6 | 3.15 | 0.49 | 7.34 | A < B, A < C A = D, B = C B > D, C > D | |
19. To what extent your superiors think the accreditation process is necessary in light of overburdening the staff | 3.23 | 0.71 | 3.5 | 0.62 | 3.42 | 0.48 | 2.98 | 0.38 | 5.73 | A < B, A < C A > D, B = C B > D, C > D | |
Satisfaction from type of training technique | 3.47 | 0.77 | 3.65 | 0.75 | 3.62 | 0.74 | 3.15 | 0.78 | 9.50 | 3444 | |
20. Frontal training in departments | 3.33 | 0.87 | 3.63 | 0.82 | 3.45 | 0.81 | 3.15 | 0.88 | 7.42 | A < B, A = C A = D, B = C B > D, C > D | |
21. Videos | 3.42 | 0.84 | 3.68 | 0.78 | 3.74 | 0.83 | 3.29 | 0.84 | 6.82 | A = B, A < C A = D, B = C B = C, C > D | |
22. Presentations in Rambam-net | 3.65 | 0.73 | 3.71 | 0.76 | 3.58 | 0.92 | 2.95 | 0.97 | 3.23 | A = B = C A > D, B = C B > D, C > D | |
23. Divisional Accreditation Forum | 3.54 | 0.86 | 3.49 | 0.65 | 3.81 | 0.71 | 3.21 | 0.67 | 4.54 | A = B = C A > D, B = C, B > D, C > D | |
24. Software | 3.48 | 0.79 | 3.77 | 0.81 | 3.67 | 0.68 | 3.12 | 0.87 | 5.23 | A = B = C A > D, B = C B > D, C > D | |
25. Phone application | 3.46 | 0.68 | 3.78 | 0.92 | 3.43 | 0.8 | 3.14 | 0.81 | 4.73 | A = B = C A > D, B = C, B > D, C > D | |
26. SMS questionnaires | 3.32 | 0.88 | 3.54 | 0.71 | 3.53 | 0.72 | 3.21 | 0.25 | 4.56 | A < B, A < C A = D, B = C, B > D, C > D | |
27. Non-coordinated surveys | 3.52 | 0.78 | 3.61 | 0.74 | 3.61 | 0.75 | 3.25 | 0.78 | 5.21 | A = B = C A > D, B = C B > C, C > D | |
28. Coordinated surveys | 3.52 | 0.83 | 3.68 | 0.84 | 3.79 | 0.78 | 3.11 | 0.78 | 7.81 | A = B = C A > D, B = C B > C, C > D | |
29. Collective group multiple choice test | 3.49 | 0.75 | 3.62 | 0.76 | 3.58 | 0.79 | 3.1 | 0.88 | 6.04 | A = B = C A > D, B = C B > C, C > D | |