Table 3 Differences between participants who helped partygoers as part of their PK volunteering, and those who did not (N = 52)
From: Party keepers: a significant community-based intervention for harm reduction
Helped (N = 33) | Did not help (N = 19) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Variable | N | % | N | % | P-valuea |
Single | 16 | 48.5 | 12 | 63.2 | 0.3 |
Resident in Central Region | 32 | 97.0 | 18 | 94.7 | 0.7 |
Academic education | 27 | 81.8 | 12 | 63.2 | 0.1 |
Above average income c | 18 | 54.5 | 6 | 31.6 | 0.1 |
M | SD | M | SD | P-valueb | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Age | 36.06 | 4.7 | 37.7 | 6.3 | 0.3 |
Level of confidence as PK | 3.74 | 0.8 | 2.7 | 0.7 | < 0.001 |
Level of satisfaction with the course | 4.07 | 1.0 | 3.7 | 0.8 | 0.2 |
Effects of PK course | |||||
Knowledge gained in course | 4.0 | 0.8 | 3.1 | 0.9 | 0.001 |
Perceived threat of drug and alcohol | 2.2 | 1.2 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 0.5 |
Community responsibility and confidence | 3.1 | 0.9 | 2.5 | 0.7 | 0.01 |